Wednesday 15 June 2016

No.2 'Colliers' in the online Kent County Archive Individual analysis - Walter Dawes of Broadgate, 30 June 1594

Walter Dawes of Broadgate, Collier “for goyng away from his Captian.” – 30 June 1594

Finding No. (copy and paste references into search box) - QM/SRc/1594/12


This case is an interesting one, for me,  as it crosses over into my other passion for the era: military History.  

It would appear Walter had been recruited for service in Brittany but, was somewhat reluctant to go.  I am pretty certain he was on his way to Brittany because of  the very helpful (and free to download) articleLevies from Kent to the Elizabethan Wars(1589—1603)” by J.J.N. McGurk in Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 88  1973.

So what was going on in Brittany in 1594 that involved sending English troops? Well, it was quite complicated but, put simply: the English Government decided to back the Protestant French King Henry IV in fighting Catholic rebels to secure the English Channel ports; the main reason being the Catholic Rebels were allied to Spain and Spanish troops were roving northern France with an eye on securing Brest, or some other deep water port, to act as a spring board for another Armada attempt on England.  The ‘Invincible Armada’ had of course failed in its task back in 1588, but at least half of the ships made it back to Spain and Alexander Farnese, Duke of Parma's Spanish Army of Flanders (that was meant to link up with the fleet and invade South East England) was unaffected by the defeat; so the threat was a real one, in fact two other Armadas did leave Spain to try and invade England, in 1596 and 1597, but both were defeated by the weather.  So in 1594 there was a very real threat of Spanish domination of the French Channel coast and the disastrous implications for England. 

Kent was one of the ‘front line’ counties and due to the departure points for expeditions to France often being in Gravesend or Dover, it made sense to recruit in county to lessen the cost of transporting troops to the departure point.  

It would appear Walter was part of the contingent, recruited in 1594,  who  “…had such a long delay in Gravesend  that many absconded from the Captain’s charge; fifteen of their names were sent to the council which then ordered Sir John Leveson and Sir Thomas Scott to have these men traced and imprisoned[1].”  Sadly the list of the 15 men is not available online to confirm he was one of them.   

It is worth noting that Walter lived a stone’s throw from North Foreland, known as ‘El cabo de Margat’ by the Spanish at the time, which was the location that appears in the instructions given to Parma and Santa Cruz, by King Philip in 1587, as the place for the Armada to anchor and wait for Parma’s army to ferry across to invade[2].  Maybe Walter would have been keener to take up arms if he realised how close Broadstairs came to becoming the front line landing beach for the Spanish invasion back in 1588, or maybe he felt, for this reason, he would rather defend his home rather than fight  across the channel?

Perhaps he was just a reluctant conscript who didn't want to be a soldier anywhere. He sounds like one of 'the very poor sort of men he was about to bring over to him out of Kent'[3], as complained about around this time by Captain Morton to Sir John Norris, leader of the expedition. It was also not unknown, at the time, to use the 'press' for foreign service as a means to rid parishes of undesirables.  Maybe Walter the collier was one of these[4]


"The Siege of Rouen 1591", by Frans Hogenberg, 1591 - 1593. English troops (in Normandy) fighting alongside French Royalists. 
Print available to download from the Rijksmuseum


 




[1] “Leviesfrom Kent to the Elizabethan Wars (1589—1603)” by J.J.N. McGurk in Archaeologia Cantiana -  Vol. 88  1973.  P. 67
[2] C. Martin and G. Parker, The Spanish Armada, 1988, p.284.
[3] McGurk, P.67
[4] For  the practice of conscription for 'social cleansing' see "A survey of the demands made on the

Tuesday 14 June 2016

No.1 'Colliers' in the online Kent County Archive Individual analysis - James Ansley of Bromley, 1606

James Ansley of Bromley, collier– “To keep the peace” – July to August 1606

Finding Nos (copy and paste references into search box) -  QM/SRc/1606/162, QM/SRc/1606/207, QM/SRc/1606/208

James seems to have had an ongoing dispute with the Arthur and William Wright, both labourers,  also of Bromley; it starts with James being subject to a recognizance to Keep the peace on 7th July 1606, Just over a month later on the 11th August both William and Arthur Wright have a recognizance against them to ‘keep the peace towards James Ansley’.  

It would seem there was no love lost between James and the Wrights.  

The most interesting aspect of James’ appearance in the records is that he is described as Collier in the original July entry and also in one of the two entries for the 11th August but, in the second is described as a labourer.  This is on the same day in the same court.  This may point to the fluid nature of being a collier: perhaps James had to supplement his charcoal making with other general labouring?  Or, the clerk of the court could have been a bit sloppy in recording occupations, as one would assume it is the same magistrate and recording staff sitting?  

There is a clue to the potential dual career possibility in the late Jos Kingston’s amazing analysis of Norton (Sheffield) ‘Life & Death in Elizabethan Norton’ at http://www.joskingston.org/LDEN/CHAP3.html#Item8 (scroll down to Charcoal Makers).  In this she finds Colliers who are recorded in official documents as both Husbandmen and a Charcoal Makers. 


'Colliers' in the online Kent County Archive

Whilst reading 'Industry in the Countryside: Wealden Society in the Sixteenth Century' by Michael Zell a footnote indicated to me sources on colliers in the Kent County Archive based in Maidstone [1].    

A quick search  of their online archive for 'collier' revealed thirty seven mentions of colliers in court cases in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries.

The earliest record is dated September 1592 and I have included entries up too August 1612 which isn’t technically Elizabethan but, it’s good stuff so it’s in there.

They are for the most part, from WEST KENT QUARTER SESSIONS RECORDS which were ‘found at Maidstone Museum in 1964’.

To speed up publication, I have decided to drip feed my analysis of the results: each blog entry will look at an individual mentioned in the archive going forward.

So what is a collier?


Before I start we need to address the term collier: what makes me so sure that these ‘colliers’ are charcoal makers and not coal miners? Well to be honest cannot say for certain; however, I think it is much more likely they are charcoal makers rather than coal miner for a number of reasons: 

Firstly, in this period there were no coal mines in Kent (the later Kent coal fields were not discovered until the 1890s) so the chances of coal mining colliers living around Kent would be very slight.  

Secondly, I have yet to find a contemporary source that refers to 'Charcoal Makers' as such: they refer to 'colliers' or sometimes 'woodcolliers'[2]

Thirdly, there are hints in the sources themselves.  The case of ‘William Mountfield of Bedhurst, collier’ is for the offence of taking ‘rewards’ from various individuals to ‘relieve them of the burden of providing charcoal for the royal household under colour of being deputy to John Roar, Purveyor’.  This is the only direct reference to charcoal in the cases examined and although it does not prove his trade was making charcoal it certainly gives a strong link.  Another clue is the record of the burial in July 1593 ‘of a collier dying suddenly at his work’, if this man was a coal miner he wouldn’t be at his work in Kent to be buried there.  I am confident that colliers referred to here are charcoal makers, and as I find more evidence of colliers being charcoal makers I will post them.

Number of individual Colliers mentioned:


Entries can be roughly broken down into:

  • 17 colliers being accused of a crime
  • 9 colliers acting as Sureties for others
  • 2 colliers being the victim of a crime
  • 3 colliers mentioned for other reasons

A very rough initial analysis seems to indicate colliers were more often on the wrong side of the law than not.


As I have already said for the foreseeable future my posts will be an analysis of these individuals in more detail in no particular order


Notes on legal Terms used in sources defined by the OED:

  1. Indictment - a formal charge or accusation of a crime.
  2. Recognisance - a bond by which a person undertakes before a court or magistrate to observer a particular condition, e.g. to appear when summoned.
  3. Surety - a person who takes responsibility for another’s undertaking.




[2] For example, Ulpian Fulwell’s sixteenth century play, Like will to like, has a character Tom Collier of Croydon, a well-known charcoal making area to feed London’s need for fuel, Colliers Wood being a nearby south London suburb that bears witness to the areas past.